

Testing time and analysis at typical shop rates to this point would go at ~$500. If it can be convinced to stop lying about its capacity.Īcquisition cost of the fakes was ~$30 and $40 respectively. To someone, theoretically.Ī class 10 64 GB flash card if it can be salvaged may be worth $7. The USB enclosure if it can be salvaged may be worth ~$10. This appears to be a class 10 quite slow by today's standards 64GB Toshiba flash device. Remember the old class 2, 4, 6 and 10? That's minimum MB/sec = class number. Initial run time estimate was 8 days for 2TB, actual was 2:46:27 failing at 2.9% of nominal capacity. While the "2TB SSD" is connected to a USB 3.1 port, MediaTester v0.4.1.0 with local data generation gives ~10 MB/sec write, ~30.7 MB/sec read, and first failing readback byte at 62,657,265,664 (~58.35 GiB). Over the course of minutes fakeflashtest v1.1.2 gets 95% through placing capacity markers, then takes 2 hours to get through the last 5% and a few minutes of reading back the markers to 30%, then spends DAYS not progressing past 30% reading them back, while burning about one core of CPU, until terminated after ~100 hours elapsed time. USBDeview gives 8.5 MB/sec write speed, 35.77MB/sec read.Ĭhipgenius gives the same info for this as the "1TB SSD", which conflicts with my earlier testing of this one, 238 GB vs 64.īack to the infinite well for another tool: a short list at leads to fakeflashtest, 13% capacity and terrible reliability which is unacceptable.

A directory listing dir /s f:\ after copy errors begin, shows 266 GB. Attempts to copy more onto, or delete an empty directory, give errors. The "2TB SSD" accepts data ok initially but very slowly, like a low speed SD card, up to showing 311 GB. Ebay listing for the 2TB M.2 USB external SSD has been removed sold by archward71 (no longer a registered user) 100% positive feedback of 14 entries located in Germany, was member since
